Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers.

AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center between February 2018 and November 2021. Women younger than 37 years who underwent single elective ET were included and all women had anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. Age, body mass index (BMI), AMH levels, and pregnancy outcomes as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Study population consisted of 75 women in the G-Rinse medium solution group and 97 women in the physiologic saline group. Clinical pregnancy rate was 58.7% and 61.9% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.673), and LBR was calculated as 41.3% and 47.4% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.430). A log-binomial regression model was used and the model was adjusted for BMI to evaluate the effect of the cervical mucus washing method on the pregnancy outcomes. There was an estimated 5% decrease in the relative risk for CPR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.2, p = 0.673). There was an estimated 13% reduction in the relative risk for LBR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23, p = 0.430). They were both statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the replacement of using G-Rinse medium solution to physiologic saline solution for cervical cleaning did not change CPR and LBR outcomes. Using physiologic saline solution can be a good alternative approach for ectocervical washing during embryo transfer in selected population because of its lower costs, easy accessibility, and common use.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of 7515 same donor oocyte cycle fresh and cryopreserved-thawed oocytes in 609 donor oocyte recipient cycles: A single institution analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Oocyte donation (OD) cycles have been used extensively over the last decades due to high success regarding live birth rate (LBR). We evaluated the reproductive outcomes of fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes in terms of fertilization rates, blast ratio, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. A total of 7515 metaphase II (MII) donor oocytes from 304 donor cycles for 609 oocyte recipients undergoing embryo transfers with either fresh or cryopreserved-thawed donor oocytes. Donor cycles that provided both 12 fresh MII oocytes to be used for one recipient and at least 12 MII oocytes which were suitable for vitrification to be used for another recipient at another time were analyzed. Fertilization rates, blastocyst ratios, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), LBR were evaluated as main outcome measures. RESULTS: When the fresh and cryopreserved-thawed OD cycles were compared, there was no significant differences between two groups in terms of age of the recipient (41.9 ± 5.7 and 40.3 ± 6.8, p = NS), number of MII oocytes (12.1 ± 0.3 and 12.6 ± 0.8, p = NS), number of 2 pronuclear (PN) (9.1 ± 1.6 and 9.7 ± 2.0, p = NS), blastocyst ratio (58.9 ± 21.7 and 51.3 ± 21.2, p = NS) and number of transferred embryos (1.9 ± 0.3 and 1.9 ± 0.3, p = NS). There was no significant difference between fresh and cryopreserved-thawed sibling donor oocyte cycles in terms of CPR (66.8 % and 60.7 % respectively, p = NS) or LBR (59.5 % and 55.1 %, respectively; p = NS). Miscarriage and multiple gestation rates were similar between groups (p = NS). Log-binomial regression analysis revealed that the use of fresh sibling oocytes was not associated with CPR or LBR, when compared to cryopreserved-thawed oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in terms of reproductive outcomes between sibling fresh OD and cryopreserved-thawed OD cycles.

Impact of endometrial thickness change in response to progesterone on live birth rates embryo transfers with fresh oocyte donation cycles.

Endometrial thickness (ENT) measurements are important to evaluate endometrial receptivity. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes has been discussed for many years with conflicting results. The aim of our study was to find out the effect of endometrial thickness (ENT) change in response to progesterone on pregnancy outcomes in embryo transfer (ET) of fresh oocyte donation (OD) recipients. The study was designed retrospectively including 134 embryo transfers with fresh OD recipients. ENT was measured by ultrasonography (USG) on the day of initial progesterone administration (ENT1) and on ET day (ENT2). The primary outcome was to determine any correlation between the ENT change and pregnancy outcomes. ENT increased in 56.7% of cases and decreased in 43.4%. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in recipients with increased ENT was 76.3%, and live birth rate (LBR) was 72.4%. CPR in recipients with decreased ENT was 69.0% and LBR was 65.5%. There was no significant difference between recipients with either increased or decreased ENT regarding CPR and LBR (p = .225 and p = .253, respectively). Our study revealed that ENT change after 6 days of progesterone administration, whether increased or decreased, does not have any significant effect on LBR and CPR in fresh OD recipients.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Measurement of endometrial thickness is beneficial to determine the endometrial receptivity. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding the usefulness of measuring endometrial thickness.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study performed with fresh oocyte donation cycles with large number of recipients for live birth rate outcomes in the literature so far. In this study, we sought to assess the impact of endometrial thickness change, in response to 6 days of progesterone administration, on live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate in embryo transfer of fresh oocyte donation recipients. We did not find no significant effect of endometrial thickness change on live birth rate when fresh young donor oocytes are fertilised with sperms having normal parameters, and implanted in oestrogen and progesterone primed endometrium.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Measurement of endometrial thickness in patients under infertility treatment provides little benefit to clinical outcomes.

Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) protocol is effective for preventing premature ovulation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Private assisted reproduction center. PATIENT(S): Eighty-seven oocyte donors and 191 recipients of fresh oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Each donor was stimulated with a flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in one cycle and with the new fPPOS protocol in the other, within a period of 6 months. FSH was started on cycle day 2-3, and 0.25 mg/day GnRH antagonist or 10 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was started on stimulation day 7 or when the leading follicle reached 14 mm, whichever came first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Duration of stimulation, gonadotropin consumption, duration of GnRH antagonist or MPA administration, number of metaphase II oocytes, and pregnancy rates in fresh oocyte recipients. RESULTS: Duration of stimulation was 11 (10-11) days in both groups. Total gonadotropin consumption was similar. Pituitary suppression was started on day 7 and lasted for 5 days in each group. There were no premature ovulations in any group. The fPPOS yielded a significantly higher number of cumulus oocyte complexes than GnRH antagonist cycles (33 [21-39] vs. 26 [18-36], respectively). Likewise, the fPPOS generated significantly more metaphase II oocytes than GnRH antagonist cycles (24 [17-34] vs. 21 [15-28], respectively). Recipients of fresh oocytes from fPPOS and GnRH antagonist cycles had similar cleavage, blastulation, implantation, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (50% vs. 48.6%). CONCLUSION(S): FPPOS with MPA seems to be an effective choice for preventing premature ovulation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation without compromising oocyte quality.